CFP last date
16 December 2024
Reseach Article

An Improved Semantic Web-based Search Model for Ecommerce using OWL2

by B. Pam, A. A. Obiniyi, O. N. Oyelade
International Journal of Applied Information Systems
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 12 - Number 5
Year of Publication: 2017
Authors: B. Pam, A. A. Obiniyi, O. N. Oyelade
10.5120/ijais2017451691

B. Pam, A. A. Obiniyi, O. N. Oyelade . An Improved Semantic Web-based Search Model for Ecommerce using OWL2. International Journal of Applied Information Systems. 12, 5 ( August 2017), 1-6. DOI=10.5120/ijais2017451691

@article{ 10.5120/ijais2017451691,
author = { B. Pam, A. A. Obiniyi, O. N. Oyelade },
title = { An Improved Semantic Web-based Search Model for Ecommerce using OWL2 },
journal = { International Journal of Applied Information Systems },
issue_date = { August 2017 },
volume = { 12 },
number = { 5 },
month = { August },
year = { 2017 },
issn = { 2249-0868 },
pages = { 1-6 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://www.ijais.org/archives/volume12/number5/995-2017451691/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijais2017451691 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2023-07-05T19:08:10.532770+05:30
%A B. Pam
%A A. A. Obiniyi
%A O. N. Oyelade
%T An Improved Semantic Web-based Search Model for Ecommerce using OWL2
%J International Journal of Applied Information Systems
%@ 2249-0868
%V 12
%N 5
%P 1-6
%D 2017
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Information sharing across independent web applications seems impossible with just the static world wide web applications. Meanwhile, with the advent of the semantic web, web applications interoperability through information sharing and Linked Data have been achieved. This interoperability is usually presented as a decentralized system that allows agents to crawl over them for information sharing or gathering, and is employed in developing web applications like E-Commerce. However, the existing e-Commerce model is being limited by its knowledge representation language. This model employs ontological approach using OWL for knowledge modeling and representation. Hence, this research seeks to create an improved e-commerce ontological base model which has a richer and expressive knowledge base with OWL2 for knowledge modeling and representation. This knowledgebase will be compared against the e-Commerce knowledge base that was modeled with OWL. Search results from the new knowledge base by the user yielded a more specific and needful outcome as compared to search on the knowledge base created with OWL.

References
  1. Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 vs Web 3.0 vs Web 4.0 vs Web 5.0(WEB1.0)(2016): – A bird’s eye on the evolution and definition Retrieved on 16-6-2016 from https://flatworldbusiness.wordpress.com/flat-education/previously/web-1-0-vs-web-2- 0-vs-web-3-0-a-bird-eye-on-the-definition/
  2. Zhang L. and Huang W. (2009). A Framework for an Ontology-based E-commerce Product Information Retrieval System. Journal Of Computers, Academy Publisher 4(6), pp 439-440
  3. Kerie, A. (2014). Engineering Semantic Web for E-Commerce Business Intelligence: A Bilingual EEPS Ontology Model. A master thesis submitted to the school of Graduate studies of Arba Minch University.
  4. Oyelade O., Junaidu S., and Obiniyi A. (2014).Semantic Web Framework for E-Commerce Based on OWL. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science. Issues, Vol. 11, Issue 3, No 2, May 2014 ISSN (Print): 1694-0814 | ISSN (Online): 1694-0784.www.IJCSI.org
  5. Obiniyi A.A, Oyelade O.N and Junaidu S.B (2014). Enhancing Reasoning and Retrieval Performance on OWL using SQWRL. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), Vol. 3 Issue 2, February.
  6. Yao W., Basu S., Li J., and Stephenson B. (2012). Modeling and Configuration of Process Variants for On-boarding Customers to IT Outsourcing. HP Laboratories HPL- 2012-157, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
  7. Jayaprabha P, and Saradha A (2010),Semantic Integration Of Heterogeneous Web Data For Tourism Domain Using Ontology Based Resource Description Language. Journal of Computer Applications, 3(3),pp4-5.
  8. Antoniou, G., and Frank V. H. (2004). Semantic Web Primer, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  9. Berners-Lee, T. (1994). Weaving the Web, The MIT Press, Cambridge
  10. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. and Lissila, O. (2001. The Semantic Web. [Online]. Retrieved on 10-5-2016 from http://sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00048144-10D2-1C70-84A9809EC588EF21.
  11. Cuenca B., Horrocks I., Motik B., Parsia B., Patel-Schneider P., and Sattler U (2008). OWL 2: The Next Step for OWL
  12. Bizer, C., F., and Heath, T., T., Berners-Lee, T., (2009). Linked Data- the Story so Far, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information System (IJSWIS,) Vol. 5(3), pp. 1-23.
  13. Gruber, T., (1993). A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies, Knowledge Acquisition, 5( 2), pp. 199-220. Management
  14. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview (Second Edition).Retrieved on 16-6-2016 from https://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Document_Overview.
  15. OWL 2 Web Ontology Languages New Features and Rationale (Second Edition) W3C Recommendation 11 December 2012. Retrieved on 17-6-201 from https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-new-features/.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

E-commerce OWL OWL2 RDF RDFS SQWRL and SPARQL