CFP last date
16 December 2024
Reseach Article

OntoEval Assessment Tool for OWL Ontology based Application

by Bekka Fatiha, Maache Salah, Djaghloul Younes
International Journal of Applied Information Systems
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 6 - Number 1
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Bekka Fatiha, Maache Salah, Djaghloul Younes
10.5120/ijais13-451017

Bekka Fatiha, Maache Salah, Djaghloul Younes . OntoEval Assessment Tool for OWL Ontology based Application. International Journal of Applied Information Systems. 6, 1 ( September 2013), 48-54. DOI=10.5120/ijais13-451017

@article{ 10.5120/ijais13-451017,
author = { Bekka Fatiha, Maache Salah, Djaghloul Younes },
title = { OntoEval Assessment Tool for OWL Ontology based Application },
journal = { International Journal of Applied Information Systems },
issue_date = { September 2013 },
volume = { 6 },
number = { 1 },
month = { September },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 2249-0868 },
pages = { 48-54 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://www.ijais.org/archives/volume6/number1/531-1017/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijais13-451017 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2023-07-05T17:59:30.182154+05:30
%A Bekka Fatiha
%A Maache Salah
%A Djaghloul Younes
%T OntoEval Assessment Tool for OWL Ontology based Application
%J International Journal of Applied Information Systems
%@ 2249-0868
%V 6
%N 1
%P 48-54
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Ontologies are increasingly used in various fields such as knowledge management, information extraction, and the semantic web. Ontology evaluation is the problem of assessing a given ontology from the point of view of a particular criterion of application, typically in order to determine which of several ontologies would best suit a particular purpose. In this paper, we propose a pricing model that allows using a number of different ontologies and assessing their performance on specific issues. We suggest an approach for evaluating the ontology based on a golden standard guided by a question generator. Following this scheme, we present the results of an experiment to test and gradually increase the performance of ontologies.

References
  1. JANEZ BRANK, MARKO GROBELNIK, DUNJA MLADENIC. “A survey of ontology evaluation techniques”. Department of Knowledge Technologies Joseph Stefan Institute.2005.
  2. PORZEL, R., MALAKA, R. “A task-based approach for ontology evaluation”. ECAI 2004 Workshop Ont. Learning and Population.
  3. YOUNES DJAGHLOUL, MURIEL FOULONNEAU, RAYNALD JADOUL, NABIL ZARY. “From informal knowledge to High Quality e-Assessment process: The OAT Semantic Approach”. Center of public research Henri Tudor.2012.
  4. MOEN, P. “Attributs, Event Sequence, and Event Type Similarity Notions for Data Mining”. Ph. D. thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland, 2000.
  5. RESNIK. “Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomie: An information-Based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural langage”. Journal of Artificial intelligence, 1999.
  6. FERNANDEZ M., A. GOMEZ-PEREZ, J. PAZOS, AND A. PAZOS. “Building a chemical ontology using methontology and the ontology design environment”. IEEE Intelligent Systems Applications, 1999.
  7. GOMÈZ-PÉREZ A. “Ontological Engineering: A state of the art”. Expert Update, Volume 2 (3), Pages 33-43. 1999.
  8. HASSINA BENSEFIA. “Ontologies en Intelligence artificielle». Université de Mohamed El-Bachir El-Ibrahimi. 2012.
  9. USCHOLD. “ONTOLOGIES: Principles, Methods and Applications”. Knowledge Engineering Review. 1996.
  10. MAACHE SALAH, TOUAHRIA MOHAMED. “Developing Ontology for Financial Investments: Algeria Case Study», International Journal of Computer Applications,(0975-8887),Volume 24-N°4,June 2011.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Ontology ontology evaluation knowledge representation semantic web